On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Once more with feeling... I've revised my v2 patch to rename the >> functions to __builtin_<fn>q rather than __builtin_<fn>f128 to avoid >> the collision with Joseph's work. I've also corrected the formatting >> problems that Segher noted with my previous attempt. >> >> Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with >> no regressions. Is this ok for trunk, and eventually for 6.2? > > I'd like to point out that there are several tests in > gcc.dg/torture/*float128*.c that can be enabled for powerpc. .. and also in gcc.dg/*float128*.c. Maybe we should add a check for float128 effective target in lib/target-supports.exp that would list all __float128 capable targets? Uros.
