Hello! > Once more with feeling... I've revised my v2 patch to rename the > functions to __builtin_<fn>q rather than __builtin_<fn>f128 to avoid > the collision with Joseph's work. I've also corrected the formatting > problems that Segher noted with my previous attempt. > > Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu with > no regressions. Is this ok for trunk, and eventually for 6.2?
I'd like to point out that there are several tests in gcc.dg/torture/*float128*.c that can be enabled for powerpc. Uros.
