On 8 June 2016 at 16:50, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 04:44:00PM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> I've tried the attached patch (which does only dg-options -> >> dg-additional-options). >> For GCC, it's better, except that on arm-none-eabi qemu complains about >> an illegal instruction when asked to use arm926 and GCC is configured with >> the default cpu. Maybe that's because check_vect does not have the expected > > check_vect installs a SIGILL handler and if the insn is invalid, excepts > a signal to be raised. Is that not the case with qemu? Or is qemu just > being too noisy? > qemu complains when executing check_vect's prologue, which contains movw r1, #35712 which is not supported either on arm926.
I don't know if the signal is not raised or if qemu hides it (I'm using qemu user mode) >> <DATE> Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org> >> >> * gcc.dg/vect/YYY.c: Use dg-additional options instead of dg-options. > > Please list all the changed tests in the ChangeLog (with : Likewise. for > all but the first one). > Yes, that's what I meant. > Ok with that change. > > Jakub
