On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 12:26:17PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > > So: should I change dg-options into dg-additional-options for all the > > > tests for consistency, or only on the 3 ones where it makes them pass? > > > (pr71259.c, vect-shift-2-big-array.c, vect-shift-2.c) > > > > I think all tests should use dg-additional-options. > > All tests in {gcc,g++}.dg/vect/, right? I agree with that.
Yes. [and most of the vect.exp fancy-filename stuff should be replaced by adding dg-additional-options] Richard.