On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 06:39:56PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > In the last email exchange, you did not say whether the patch was acceptible > for inclusion. I added documentation for -mlra, since you did mention it > should > be documented. I tweaked the -mdebug=reg output so that it always prints > if LRA was used or not (previously, it only printed if LRA was true). I added > two spaces between sentences in the ChangeLog files. > > Is this patch acceptable to be checked into the trunk?
You forgot to attach the patch. Segher