On Thu, 28 Apr 2016, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > On 28.04.2016 16:29, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > Another option would be to try if mini-gmp is enough for our > > (in-tree) use and what the performance impact would be if we'd > > use that (in-tree). > > > > Yes, we would certainly never need more than that subset. > > But I don't see how mpfr can be built with mini-gmp. > I tried to and failed early in mpfr/configure. > Any ideas?
No idea - it of course breaks down if mpfr cannot work with mini-gmp. Richard.
