> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:40:43AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > Given the BZ & list discussion, I'd consider the patch approved. > > > > I *think* the way to deal with the BZ is to change the regression marker to > > 7 and the target milestone as well. I think leaving it as a P1 would be > > fine as that'll force revisiting in the gcc-7 timeframe. > > Thanks, I've done so now. Thanks for doing that! I am indeed happy with deferring this to GCC 7
Honza > > Marek
