On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 09:43:26AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 04/14/2016 09:25 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> >On 04/13/16 15:41, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> >>The fini_constexpr stuff is OK immediately.
> >
> >As those two objects are currently GTY((deletable)) I don't think that's
> >necessary. Have I missed something?
>
> True, I suppose it doesn't make much difference.
Right now our debugging shows that the remaining issue is just an unrelated
ipa-devirt bug (where the aggressive pruning of BLOCK trees with -g0 results
in different devirt decisions from non-pruned one).
So we hopefully can get away with deletable.
Jakub
