On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 09:59:12AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote: >> > 2016-03-12 Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> >> > >> > PR target/70098 >> > * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (*ctr<mode>_internal1, >> > *ctr<mode>_internal2, >> > *ctr<mode>_internal5, *ctr<mode>_internal6): Also allow "d" as >> > output. >> > (define_split for the GPR case): Use int_reg_operand instead of >> > gpc_reg_operand for the output. >> > >> > gcc/testsuite/ >> > PR target/70098 >> > * g++.dg/pr70098.C: New testcase. >> >> This is okay. >> >> The testcase will need some XFAILs. > > That wasn't so easy. I came up with the following; okay as well? > (I'll fold it before committing). > > > Segher > > > gcc/testsuite/ > * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_powerpc64_no_dm): > New function.
This is okay with me. Should the testcase go in g++.dg or gcc.target/powerpc? Thanks, David
