On 19.02.2016 21:08, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 08:04:39PM +0000, Bernd Edlinger wrote: >> but you are just adding another term to this expression: >> !(TREE_CODE (exp) == CONSTRUCTOR >> && bitsize % BITS_PER_UNIT == 0) > > No. Please read the code again. I'm adding another case > after this one. >
Ok, now I see. Sorry for the noise. Bernd.
