On 2/7/2016 10:45 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 8. 2. 2016 04:45, David Wohlferd wrote:
I replied with a patch that includes most of the changes you asked for
(see inline below). Were you waiting on me for something more?
ChangeLog entries are still missing.
I'll add them back in the next post.
David, there is a tool that you can use to check the patch
for some style-nits before submission.
I was not aware of this tool. I'll fix these before the next post.
At one point you proposed renaming the option -Wbasic-asm. This seemed
a little terse (and possibly misleading) so I counter-proposed
-Wbasic-asm-in-function (a little verbose, but clearer). I have no
strong preferences here, and you haven't said one way or the other. Are
we just going to stick with -Wonly-top-basic-asm?
Hopefully one more try and this will be done.
Thanks,
dw
