On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 01:11:36PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > On 01/26/2016 01:29 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > >In my opinion we should not warn for any asm that means the same both > >as basic and as extended asm. The problem then becomes, what *is* the > >meaning of a basic asm, what does it clobber. > > I think this may be too hard to figure out in general without parsing > the asm string, which we don't really want to do.
That depends on the semantics of basic asm. With the currently implemented semantics, it is trivial. Segher
