On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 02:53:06PM +0100, Mikael Morin wrote: > Le 03/12/2015 10:29, Janne Blomqvist a écrit : > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer > > <rep.dot....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> As said, we could as well use a list of candidates with NULL as record > >> marker. > >> Implementation cosmetics. Steve seems to not be thrilled by the > >> overall idea in the first place, so unless there is clear support by > >> somebody else i won't pursue this any further, it's not that i'm bored > >> or ran out of stuff i should do.. ;) > > > > FWIW, I think the idea of this patch is quite nice, and I'd like to > > see it in the compiler. > > > I like this feature as well. > > > I'm personally Ok with "C++-isms", but nowadays my contributions are > > so minor that my opinion shouldn't carry that much weight on this > > matter. > > > Same here. > David Malcolm suggested to move the candidate selection code to the > common middle-end infrastructure, which would move half of the so-called > "bloat" there. Steve, would that work for you?
Fine with me. When debugging, if I run into C++isms, I'll stop and move to a new bug. We certainly have enough open bugs to choose from. -- Steve
