On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:06 PM, Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org> wrote:
> On 10/22/15 10:26, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Nathan Sidwell <nat...@acm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/22/15 04:07, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah, please make them either end or start a BB so we have to check
>>>> at most a single stmt.  ECF_RETURNS_TWICE should achieve that,
>>>> it also makes it a code motion barrier.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Just so I'm clear, you're not saying that RETURNS_TWICE will stop the
>>> call
>>> being duplicated though?
>>
>>
>> It will in practice.  RETURNS_TWICE will get you an abnormal edge from
>> entry (I think)
>
>
> Won't that interfere with the OMP  machinery, which expects correctly nested
> loops?  (no in-to or out-of loop jumps)

Probably yes.

> nathan

Reply via email to