On 10/12/2015 04:04 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/08/2015 07:37 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:On 10/07/2015 06:02 PM, Jeff Law wrote:I'm slightly concerned about the darwin, windows and solaris bits. The former primarily because Darwin has been a general source of pain, and in the others because I'm not sure the cross testing will exercise that code terribly much.I'll go ahead and approve all the config/ bits. Please be on the lookout for any fallout.I'll try and get into more of the other patches tomorrow.
OK, I've checked in the config changes. I rebuilt all the cross compilers for the 200+ targets, and they still build.. as well as bootstrapping on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with no regressions.
So. If any one runs into a native build issue you can either add the required header back in, or back out the file for your port, and I'll look into why something happened. The only thing I can imagine is files that have conditional compilation based on a macro that is only ever defined on a native build command line or headers. Its unlikely... but possible.
I've attached the latest version of the patch for the record. Andrew
config2-final.patch.bz2
Description: application/bzip
