snip...
> 
> Having classpath (with binary files!) In the GCC SVN (or future git)
> repository is a significant burden, not to mention the size of the
> distributed source tarball.
> 
> If we can get rid of that that would be a great step in reducing the burden.
> 
> Iff we can even without classpath build enough of java to be useful (do you
> really need gcj or only gij for bootstrapping openjdk? After all ecj is just
> a drop-in to gcc as well).

All the Java compilers are written in Java (ecj & javac). So to run them, you
need a JVM and its class library.

It's those binary files which allow gcj to bootstrap the stack. If OpenJDK
had a minimal binary class library, it would be able to bootstrap itself.

But, as things stand, you need enough of the JDK to run a Java compiler
and build the OpenJDK class libraries. GCJ currently fulfils that need
where there isn't already an OpenJDK installation available.
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: ed25519/35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222

PGP Key: rsa4096/248BDC07 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F  8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07

Reply via email to