On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 03/08/15 13:33, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>>> 2015-07-30 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>
>>>
>>> * ifcvt.c (noce_try_store_flag_constants): Make logic of the case
>>> when diff == STORE_FLAG_VALUE or diff == -STORE_FLAG_VALUE more
>>> explicit. Prefer to add the flag whenever possible.
>>> (noce_process_if_block): Try noce_try_store_flag_constants before
>>> noce_try_cmove.
>>>
>>> 2015-07-30 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>
>>>
>>> * gcc.target/aarch64/csel_bfx_1.c: New test.
>>> * gcc.target/aarch64/csel_imms_inc_1.c: Likewise.
>>
>> This patch regressed following tests on x86_64:
>>
>> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cmov2.c scan-assembler sbb
>> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cmov3.c scan-assembler cmov[^3]
The difference for cmov3.c on x86_64 is:
cmpl %esi, %edi
movl $-5, %edx
movl $5, %eax
cmovg %edx, %eax
ret
vs. new code:
xorl %eax, %eax
cmpl %esi, %edi
setle %al
negl %eax
andl $10, %eax
subl $5, %eax
ret
I'm not sure old code is really better than new. HJ, do you have any
better insight?
Uros.
