Hi Steve, Thanks for looking at the code. The error you experience is known to me. The bug is present in gfortran and only exposed by this patch. Unfortunately is the pr58586 not addressing this specific error. It may be in the bugtracker under a different number already. Furthermore did I not want to extend the patch for 58586 any further, because I have learned that the more complicated a patch gets the longer review takes. For making the testcase run fine we also simply can comment the line.
Regards, Andre Am 4. Juli 2015 18:24:59 MESZ, schrieb Steve Kargl <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>: >On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 11:29:00AM +0200, Andre Vehreschild wrote: >> Ping! >> > >(Un)fortnuately you're working on an area of Fortran >that I don't know and in parts of the tree that takes >me a long time to decipher (aka, trans-*.c files). > >I applied your patch and see several failures. I'll >note that I did not start from a clean obj/. So, there >is the possibility that some *.o file needed to get >rebuilt but didn't. Anyhow, > >laptop-kargl:kargl[300] gfc -o z alloc_comp_class_4.f03 && ./z > >Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory >reference. > >Backtrace for this error: >#0 0x2808B9A6 >#1 0x2808AB19 >#2 0xBFBFF003 >#3 0x8048DEA >#4 0x8049097 >#5 0x8048779 >Segmentation fault (core dumped) > >Hmmm, Ok, I just looked at the source for alloc_comp_class_4.f03 >and found line 94. > > temp = t_init() ! <-- This derefs a null-pointer currently > >Not sure what to make of this. -- Andre Vehreschild * Kreuzherrenstr. 8 * 52062 Aachen Mail: ve...@gmx.de * Tel.: +49 241 9291018
