On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/20/2011 02:00 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> operands[0] = expand_simple_binop (Pmode, code, op0, op1, NULL_RTX, 0,
>> OPTAB_DIRECT);
>> }
>> + else if (TARGET_X32)
>> + operands[0] = convert_memory_address (Pmode, operands[0]);
>> })
>>
>> (define_insn "*tablejump_1"
>> ---
>>
>> Richard, is this OK for trunk with the last patch if they work?
>
> Yeah.
>
> I had put the convert_memory_address first, because I thought it
> would help match modes inside the PIC section as well. Anyway, I
> see that expand_simple_binop will handle mode conversions itself,
> so this placement is also ok. I'm only mildly curious as to why
> that placement failed.
>
The difference is:
Working:
72d0: 4e 63 3c b8 movslq (%rax,%r15,4),%r15
72d4: 4c 01 f8 add %r15,%rax
72d7: ff e0 jmpq *%rax
not working:
72d0: 46 8b 3c b8 mov (%rax,%r15,4),%r15d
72d4: 4c 01 f8 add %r15,%rax
72d7: ff e0 jmpq *%rax
--
H.J.
