I am fine with waiting until stage 1. When that is likely to be? -- Caroline Tice cmt...@google.com
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/27/2015 10:44 AM, Caroline Tice wrote: >> >> It took me a while to get a test case I'm happy with, so I'm >> re-submitting the whole patch for approval. >> >> 2015-03-27 Caroline Tice <cmt...@google.com> >> >> * final.c (final_scan_insn): Change 'cold_function_name' to >> 'cold_partition_name' and make it a global variable; also output >> assembly to give it a 'FUNC' type, if appropriate. >> * varasm.c (cold_partition_name): Declare and initialize global >> variable. >> (assemble_start_function): Re-set value for cold_partition_name. >> (assemble_end_function): Output assembly to calculate size of >> cold >> partition, and associate size with name, if appropriate. >> * varash.h (cold_partition_name): Add extern declaration for >> global >> variable. >> * testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-prof/cold_partition_label.c: Add >> dg-final-use >> to scan assembly for cold partition name and size. > > Given we're late in stage4, can this wait until stage1, where it should be > considered pre-approved? I'd hate to mess up the PA or PTX ports at this > stage in the release process. > > jeff >
