>> 28 mars 2015, 01:33, Steve Kargl <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>: >> >> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 01:01:57AM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: >>> >>> AFAICT your test succeeds without your patch and does not test that the ICE >>> reported by FX is gone (indeed it is with your patch). >>> >> >> Yeah, I thought about that, but did not pursue it, yet. >> It is a zero-size string issue because FX's initialization >> is empty. I'll play a little bit tomorrow with the >> testcase case. > On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:42:29PM +0100, Dominique d'Humi?res wrote: > See also my comment 2 in pr65429. > > Cheers, > > Dominique
Can one do anything useful with a zero-sized array of strings where the length of a non-existent element of the array is nonzero? -- Steve
