See also my comment 2 in pr65429. Cheers,
Dominique > Le 28 mars 2015 à 01:33, Steve Kargl <s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> a > écrit : > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 01:01:57AM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: >> >> AFAICT your test succeeds without your patch and does not test that the ICE >> reported by FX is gone (indeed it is with your patch). >> > > Yeah, I thought about that, but did not pursue it, yet. > It is a zero-size string issue because FX's initialization > is empty. I'll play a little bit tomorrow with the > testcase case. > > -- > Steve
