On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:49 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> This patch documents knl. The PR is asking for also documenting >> slm, but I believe those were intentionally removed from the documentation >> as deprecated aliases, at least that is my reading of the >> 2013-12-23 H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com> >> Tocar Ilya <ilya.to...@intel.com> >> ... >> * doc/invoke.texi: Replace corei7, corei7-avx, core-avx-i, >> core-avx2, atom, slm with nehalem, sandybridge, ivybridge, >> haswell, bonnel, silvermont. Add westmere. >> change, so I think documenting knl is all we want right now. >> Or should we use knightslanding and make knl an undocumented alias? > > H.J., any preferences here? I think that knightslanding is just too > long (and two words), so I'd prefer knl. > >> 2015-03-10 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> >> >> PR target/65222 >> * doc/invoke.texi: Add knl as x86 -march=/-mtune= CPU type. > > Let's wait for HJ, the patch is otherwise OK and safe for mainline. >
It is fine with me. Thanks. -- H.J.
