Hi!
This patch documents knl. The PR is asking for also documenting
slm, but I believe those were intentionally removed from the documentation
as deprecated aliases, at least that is my reading of the
2013-12-23 H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com>
Tocar Ilya <ilya.to...@intel.com>
...
* doc/invoke.texi: Replace corei7, corei7-avx, core-avx-i,
core-avx2, atom, slm with nehalem, sandybridge, ivybridge,
haswell, bonnel, silvermont. Add westmere.
change, so I think documenting knl is all we want right now.
Or should we use knightslanding and make knl an undocumented alias?
2015-03-10 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
PR target/65222
* doc/invoke.texi: Add knl as x86 -march=/-mtune= CPU type.
--- gcc/doc/invoke.texi.jj 2015-03-10 11:26:42.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/doc/invoke.texi 2015-03-10 18:20:03.350334993 +0100
@@ -21977,6 +21977,12 @@ instruction set support.
Intel Silvermont CPU with 64-bit extensions, MOVBE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3,
SSSE3,
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, POPCNT, AES, PCLMUL and RDRND instruction set support.
+@item knl
+Intel Knight's Landing CPU with 64-bit extensions, MOVBE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3,
+SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, POPCNT, AVX, AVX2, AES, PCLMUL, FSGSBASE, RDRND, FMA,
+BMI, BMI2, F16C, RDSEED, ADCX, PREFETCHW, AVX512F, AVX512PF, AVX512ER and
+AVX512CD instruction set support.
+
@item k6
AMD K6 CPU with MMX instruction set support.
Jakub
