"H.J. Lu" <hjl.to...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Rainer Orth > <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: >> Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> writes: >> >>> On 07/13/2011 09:57 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: >>>> Do you think the revised crtfastmath patch is safe enough to commit >>>> together to avoid this mess? >>> >>> Probably. >> >> Ok. I'll will take this on me to get us out of this mess. It has >> survived i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, >> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, and i386-apple-darwin9.8.0 bootstraps, so the >> risk seems acceptable. >> >>>> +# -frandom-seed is necessary to keep the mangled name of the constructor >>>> on >>>> +# Tru64 Unix stable, but harmless otherwise. >>> >>> Instead of implying permanent stability, I'd mention bootstrap comparison >>> failures specifically. >> >> Ok, will do. > > I think your patch caused: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49739
Same on ia64: Configuration mismatch! Extra parts from gcc directory: crtbegin.o crtbeginS.o crtend.o crtendS.o Extra parts from libgcc: crtbegin.o crtend.o crtbeginS.o crtendS.o crtfastmath.o Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E "And now for something completely different."
