On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> writes: > >> On 07/13/2011 09:57 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: >>> Do you think the revised crtfastmath patch is safe enough to commit >>> together to avoid this mess? >> >> Probably. > > Ok. I'll will take this on me to get us out of this mess. It has > survived i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, and i386-apple-darwin9.8.0 bootstraps, so the > risk seems acceptable. > >>> +# -frandom-seed is necessary to keep the mangled name of the constructor on >>> +# Tru64 Unix stable, but harmless otherwise. >> >> Instead of implying permanent stability, I'd mention bootstrap comparison >> failures specifically. > > Ok, will do.
I think your patch caused: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49739 -- H.J.
