On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Rainer Orth
<r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
> Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> On 07/13/2011 09:57 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> Do you think the revised crtfastmath patch is safe enough to commit
>>> together to avoid this mess?
>>
>> Probably.
>
> Ok.  I'll will take this on me to get us out of this mess.  It has
> survived i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11,
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, and i386-apple-darwin9.8.0 bootstraps, so the
> risk seems acceptable.
>
>>> +# -frandom-seed is necessary to keep the mangled name of the constructor on
>>> +# Tru64 Unix stable, but harmless otherwise.
>>
>> Instead of implying permanent stability, I'd mention bootstrap comparison
>> failures specifically.
>
> Ok, will do.

I think your patch caused:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49739

-- 
H.J.

Reply via email to