Jason suggested keeping it in the branch since it doesn't fix any regressions, so it's living there for now.
AldyOn Jan 8, 2015 4:24 AM, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 12/19/14 11:03, Jason Merrill wrote: > > > > First of all, my bad Richard. I vaguely remember you mentioning something > > about Java, but it was early enough in the project that I had no idea what > > you were talking about. Thanks for your patience. > > > >> It looks like java aliases are still using assemble_alias directly; > >> switching to using same_body aliases like thunks and such should handle > >> the issue. > > > > > > Ah, I see. Attached is a patch against _MAINLINE_ that fixes the issue I > > am > > seeing, without introducing any regressions. > > Well, I think it's a bit late now (but only affects Java, so...). Jasons > call. > > > Would it be crazy to ask for permission to commit this into mainline, and > > avoiding dragging this along on the branch? If not, I have a similar patch > > for the branch I can commit there. > > > > Let me know. > > Thanks for fixing this! > Richard. > > > Thanks for everyone's input. > > Aldy
