On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 12/19/14 11:03, Jason Merrill wrote: > > First of all, my bad Richard. I vaguely remember you mentioning something > about Java, but it was early enough in the project that I had no idea what > you were talking about. Thanks for your patience. > >> It looks like java aliases are still using assemble_alias directly; >> switching to using same_body aliases like thunks and such should handle >> the issue. > > > Ah, I see. Attached is a patch against _MAINLINE_ that fixes the issue I am > seeing, without introducing any regressions.
Well, I think it's a bit late now (but only affects Java, so...). Jasons call. > Would it be crazy to ask for permission to commit this into mainline, and > avoiding dragging this along on the branch? If not, I have a similar patch > for the branch I can commit there. > > Let me know. Thanks for fixing this! Richard. > Thanks for everyone's input. > Aldy
