On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 03:08:21PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote: >> > I fear this isn't enough considering pass-by-value aggregates that >> > are callee copied. And I guess there are other cases. Eric, what >> > do you suggest here? >> >> I agree that there are probably other cases, but this seems to be the best >> way >> out for now. There is still similar code in the expander for asm operands >> (dominated by the same code in the gimplifier) so calling mark_addressable >> this late is presumably acceptable. > > Won't that cause problems later on during expansion of the same function? > The decl won't suddenly be a gimple reg anymore. I mean, shouldn't the > marking be postponed until expansion finishes?
It's not a register anyway as we've seen a MEM_EXPR with it. Richard. > Jakub >
