On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 03:08:21PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > I fear this isn't enough considering pass-by-value aggregates that
> > are callee copied. And I guess there are other cases. Eric, what
> > do you suggest here?
>
> I agree that there are probably other cases, but this seems to be the best
> way
> out for now. There is still similar code in the expander for asm operands
> (dominated by the same code in the gimplifier) so calling mark_addressable
> this late is presumably acceptable.
Won't that cause problems later on during expansion of the same function?
The decl won't suddenly be a gimple reg anymore. I mean, shouldn't the
marking be postponed until expansion finishes?
Jakub
