On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> 2011-06-05 Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com>
>
> * config/i386/i386.md (*movdf_internal_rex64) <case 8,9,10>:
> Remove MODE_TI handling. Remove SSE1 handling in attribute "mode"
> calculation.
> (*movdf_internal_rex64) <case 6,7,8>: Remove MODE_TI handling.
> Simplify MODE_V1DF and MODE_V2SF handling.
> (*movsf_internal): Remove x constraint from operand 1 alternative 7.
> Simplify MODE_SF handling.
>
> Patch was bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnuj
> {,-m32} AVX target. Committed to mainline SVN.
>
Hi Uros,
The new *movsf_internal patter has
[(set (match_operand:SF 0 "nonimmediate_operand"
"=f,m,f,?r ,?m,x,x,x,m,!*y,!m,!*y,?Yi,?r,!*Ym,!r")
(match_operand:SF 1 "general_operand"
"fm,f,G,rmF,Fr,C,x,m,x,m ,*y,*y ,r ,Yi,r ,*Ym"))]
...
case 7:
case 8:
if (TARGET_AVX && REG_P (operands[0]) && REG_P (operands[1]))
return "vmovss\t{%1, %0, %0|%0, %0, %1}";
return "%vmovss\t{%1, %0|%0, %1}";
Since 7 is store and 8 is load,
if (TARGET_AVX && REG_P (operands[0]) && REG_P (operands[1]))
will always be false. Should we remove it?
Thanks.
--
H.J.
