On 03/30/2011 01:53 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > This comes back to the point that we really should know up-front what > modes op0 and op1 actually have. (The thing I left as a future clean-up.) > Until then, the process implemented by yesterday's patch was supposed to be: > > - work out what mode opN actually has at this point in time > - see if the target has specifically asked for a different mode > - if so, convert the operand
Ok, I get it. The patch is ok as-is. r~
