Andreas Krebbel <kreb...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> On 03/22/2011 06:48 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
>> Ok.  Watch out for other target problems this week.
>
> This unfortunately broke bootstrap on s390.

This is PR 48263.  Since it seems to be affecting several targets,
and since my bootstrap seems to be taking a looong time, I'll post
the patch here before testing has finished.

> Just copying the pre-patch behaviour fixes the problem for me:

I think we need to undo more of the patch, and leave the conversion
outside of the new interface.

Sorry for the breakage.

Richard


gcc/
        PR rtl-optimization/48263
        * optabs.c (expand_binop_directly): Reinstate convert_modes code
        and original commutative_p handling.  Use maybe_gen_insn.

Index: gcc/optabs.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/optabs.c        2011-03-24 09:18:00.000000000 +0000
+++ gcc/optabs.c        2011-03-24 09:36:46.000000000 +0000
@@ -1269,6 +1269,38 @@ expand_binop_directly (enum machine_mode
   if (!shift_optab_p (binoptab))
     xop1 = avoid_expensive_constant (mode1, binoptab, xop1, unsignedp);
 
+  /* In case the insn wants input operands in modes different from
+     those of the actual operands, convert the operands.  It would
+     seem that we don't need to convert CONST_INTs, but we do, so
+     that they're properly zero-extended, sign-extended or truncated
+     for their mode.  */
+
+  if (GET_MODE (xop0) != mode0 && mode0 != VOIDmode)
+    xop0 = convert_modes (mode0,
+                         GET_MODE (xop0) != VOIDmode
+                         ? GET_MODE (xop0)
+                         : mode,
+                         xop0, unsignedp);
+
+  if (GET_MODE (xop1) != mode1 && mode1 != VOIDmode)
+    xop1 = convert_modes (mode1,
+                         GET_MODE (xop1) != VOIDmode
+                         ? GET_MODE (xop1)
+                         : mode,
+                         xop1, unsignedp);
+
+  /* If operation is commutative,
+     try to make the first operand a register.
+     Even better, try to make it the same as the target.
+     Also try to make the last operand a constant.  */
+  if (commutative_p
+      && swap_commutative_operands_with_target (target, xop0, xop1))
+    {
+      swap = xop1;
+      xop1 = xop0;
+      xop0 = swap;
+    }
+
   /* Now, if insn's predicates don't allow our operands, put them into
      pseudo regs.  */
 
@@ -1291,41 +1323,25 @@ expand_binop_directly (enum machine_mode
     tmp_mode = mode;
 
   create_output_operand (&ops[0], target, tmp_mode);
-  create_convert_operand_from (&ops[1], xop0, mode, unsignedp);
-  create_convert_operand_from (&ops[2], xop1, mode, unsignedp);
-  if (maybe_legitimize_operands (icode, 0, 3, ops))
-    {
-      /* If operation is commutative,
-        try to make the first operand a register.
-        Even better, try to make it the same as the target.
-        Also try to make the last operand a constant.  */
-      if (commutative_p
-         && swap_commutative_operands_with_target (ops[0].value, ops[1].value,
-                                                   ops[2].value))
-       {
-         swap = ops[2].value;
-         ops[2].value = ops[1].value;
-         ops[1].value = swap;
-       }
-
-      pat = GEN_FCN (icode) (ops[0].value, ops[1].value, ops[2].value);
-      if (pat)
+  create_input_operand (&ops[1], xop0, mode0);
+  create_input_operand (&ops[2], xop1, mode1);
+  pat = maybe_gen_insn (icode, 3, ops);
+  if (pat)
+    {
+      /* If PAT is composed of more than one insn, try to add an appropriate
+        REG_EQUAL note to it.  If we can't because TEMP conflicts with an
+        operand, call expand_binop again, this time without a target.  */
+      if (INSN_P (pat) && NEXT_INSN (pat) != NULL_RTX
+         && ! add_equal_note (pat, ops[0].value, binoptab->code,
+                              ops[1].value, ops[2].value))
        {
-         /* If PAT is composed of more than one insn, try to add an appropriate
-            REG_EQUAL note to it.  If we can't because TEMP conflicts with an
-            operand, call expand_binop again, this time without a target.  */
-         if (INSN_P (pat) && NEXT_INSN (pat) != NULL_RTX
-             && ! add_equal_note (pat, ops[0].value, binoptab->code,
-                                  ops[1].value, ops[2].value))
-           {
-             delete_insns_since (last);
-             return expand_binop (mode, binoptab, op0, op1, NULL_RTX,
-                                  unsignedp, methods);
-           }
-
-         emit_insn (pat);
-         return ops[0].value;
+         delete_insns_since (last);
+         return expand_binop (mode, binoptab, op0, op1, NULL_RTX,
+                              unsignedp, methods);
        }
+
+      emit_insn (pat);
+      return ops[0].value;
     }
   delete_insns_since (last);
   return NULL_RTX;

Reply via email to