On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 23:50 +0200, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> > Just guessing at the numbers, does the following patch fix the
> > failures for you?
>
> As I am currently bootstrapping gcc, I cannot regtest right now, but running
> the
> test manually I get 256 at -m32 (I guess this is right) while I get 272 at
> -m64
> (so the test will fail).
Ok, slightly updated. How about this? Although it seems strange that
darwin has such a large amount of inherent stack usage compare to
linux.
Peter
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c (revision 171620)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c (working copy)
@@ -31,11 +31,19 @@
# define SIZE 248
# endif
#elif defined (__powerpc64__) || defined (__PPC64__)
-# define SIZE 180
+# if defined (__APPLE__)
+# define SIZE 132
+# else
+# define SIZE 180
+# endif
#elif defined (__powerpc__) || defined (__PPC__) || defined (__ppc__) \
|| defined (__POWERPC__) || defined (PPC) || defined (_IBMR2)
# if defined (__ALTIVEC__)
-# define SIZE 220
+# if defined (__APPLE__)
+# define SIZE 204
+# else
+# define SIZE 220
+# endif
# else
# define SIZE 240
# endif
