Janne Blomqvist wrote: ... >> Hi Janne, >> >> These requested changes are in addition to (and independent of) >> the changes that I've already posted here. > > Yes, it was perhaps a bit unreasonable to ask you to fix this. OTOH > with your changes gfc_free() was just a wrapper around free() and > should thus be removed as unnecessary. Also, I believe this "proper" > fix is more in the spirit of the request by Tobias and the message he > linked to discussing the removal of gfc_free(). > >> The first cset below >> does your #2 and #3, and the second does #1. I separate them for >> review because #1 is completely mechanical, while the others >> are manual. You may prefer to combine them before pushing, for >> bisection. Let me know if you'd prefer I submit in that form. > > All 3 changesets are ok for 4.7. > > I think it's fine to commit them separately if you prefer. If so, > preferably in the order #3, #1, #2 in order to keep every revision > buildable. > > Thanks for working on this!
Just so we're clear... Currently while I do have a sourceware account, I'm not in the gcc group, so don't have commit access, sourceware$ id -a|grep gcc [Exit 1] so someone else would have to commit my changes. Or add me to the "gcc" group and I will do it. Another recently-approved change may be in limbo for this reason: avoid memory overrun in a test leading to potential double-free * testsuite/test-expandargv.c (writeout_test): Fix off-by-one error: i.e., do copy the trailing NUL byte.