https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #254 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de> --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #253) > (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #252) > > (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #250) > > > This builds fine. I will try to build Kaz's tree now as it is. > > > > I suggest, once this is verified to work, that we start upstreaming the > > patches and perform potentially needed bug fixing later. > > Some of the patches could be merged in master as-is. However, some of them > are clearly quick hacks to get it to work somehow right now and get the > overall picture of the problem, like Kaz said himself before. > > For some of the issues the actual reason should be investigated first. > Otherwise this "we will fix it later" will never happen and we'll have an > even bigger mess of hacks to maintain further down the line -- like with > some of the > 20 year old issues in the backend. OK, thanks for the clarification. I'd suggest then to upstream everything that has been tested to work and is also fine to merge as-is.
