https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114902

--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> We go from CCGC with a sign_extend to a zero_extend with CCZ. that can't be
> right.

Why not?  We prefer zero_extend whenever it has the same result.

Reply via email to