https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114902
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > We go from CCGC with a sign_extend to a zero_extend with CCZ. that can't be > right. Why not? We prefer zero_extend whenever it has the same result.