https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114416

--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot 
Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot
> Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
>> --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>> Do you happen to have some spare cycles to conduct a testing cycle of the 
>> above
>> tentative fix?  It only affects the 64-bit ABI so a sparc64/sparcv9 one would
>> be sufficient (Unfortunately I no longer have access to my SPARC/Solaris 
>> setup
>> and haven't tried the Compile Farm yet).
>
> Sure: I've kept one half of the T8-1 hosting the new Solaris 11.4/SPARC
> cfarm node to myself ;-)  I've also got a Linux/sparc64 LDom around
> since the cfarm instance has been very unstable lately.

The sparc-sun-solaris2.11 bootstrap (both multilibs) has just completed
successfully without regressions.

However, sparc/sol2.h needed an #undef to fix

In file included from ./tm.h:27,
                 from /vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/gencheck.cc:23:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/config/sparc/sol2.h:460:9: error:
"SUN_V9_ABI_COMPATIBILITY" redefined [-Werror]
  460 | #define SUN_V9_ABI_COMPATIBILITY 1
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from ./tm.h:24:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.h:1705:9: note: this is the
location of the previous definition
 1705 | #define SUN_V9_ABI_COMPATIBILITY 0
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu one will be running for a couple more
hours, though.

Btw., I thought about running gcc.dg/compat against Studio 12.6 cc.  I'd
started trying some time ago, but got distracted.  At the very least, I
needed -features=extensions -DSKIP_COMPLEX_INT for a considerable part
of that testsuite to compile at all, for the likes of

"/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/pr102024_test.h",
line 7: zero-sized struct/union

"/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1.h",
line 197: invalid type combination

Reply via email to