https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114416
--- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- > --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > OK, thanks, let's go ahead for Solaris then, but I agree that we'd better do > nothing for other platforms at this point. Right, I forgot that there are others (and I cannot test any of them at this point; I don't even know if current BSDs still support SPARC at all). > Do you happen to have some spare cycles to conduct a testing cycle of the > above > tentative fix? It only affects the 64-bit ABI so a sparc64/sparcv9 one would > be sufficient (Unfortunately I no longer have access to my SPARC/Solaris setup > and haven't tried the Compile Farm yet). Sure: I've kept one half of the T8-1 hosting the new Solaris 11.4/SPARC cfarm node to myself ;-) I've also got a Linux/sparc64 LDom around since the cfarm instance has been very unstable lately.
