https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109145
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2bb71424636fba7944b36b1689e9df22a53f1a3f commit r13-6732-g2bb71424636fba7944b36b1689e9df22a53f1a3f Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> Date: Fri Mar 17 09:58:08 2023 +0100 testsuite: Fix up forwprop-39.c testcase [PR109145] As written in the PR, newlib headers aren't C11 compliant in that they don't define CMPLXF macro, and glibc before 2.16 doesn't define that either. I think it is easier to use __builtin_complex directly, over another patch which keeps including complex.h but defines CMPLXF if it isn't defined, we want to test how forwprop behaves rather than what complex.h defines or doesn't define. 2023-03-17 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR testsuite/109145 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-39.c: Remove -std=c11 from dg-options. Don't include complex.h. (foo): Use __builtin_complex rather than CMPLXF.
