https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108965
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Christopher Friedt from comment #6) > It's supported OOTB in `clang++` but fails in `g++`. Nobody is disputing that, but Clang supports lots of things that aren't valid in C++ and aren't supported by G++, and G++ supports things that aren't valid in C++ and aren't supported by Clang. That's not a bug. > The example above is the simplest example that illustrates the issue. Yes, and it's not valid C++. > I am not being abusive, but it certainly did feel like gaslighting to read > "you're doing it wrong" / close invalid without any consideration. I commented explaining that it's not in the C++ standard, and followed up in the github issue where the real bug is. That's hardly "without consideration". I've shown how to fix your C++ code to make it valid in C++11, and pointed out a problem in your C code using _Generic. I didn't have to do any of that, and I certainly won't bother doing so again.
