https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108965
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Christopher Friedt from comment #0) > It's not clear to me if any part of the ISO C++ standard requires a C++ > compiler to parse C11 _Generic, It's very clear that it doesn't, _Generic is never mentioned anywhere in the C++ standard. > but it certainly can make life less > pleasant, as the equivalent C++ code can sometimes rely on static inline > constexpr templates which are apparently "not cool" until C++14. This Why not? What exactly is the equivalent code you're referring to? C++ has never needed _Generic because it supports function overloading.
