https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108737
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I think this is another case where control dependences do not work as intended. Marking useful stmt: foo (); and we have <bb 2> [local count: 3508266]: x_4 = foo (); if (x_4 != 0) goto <bb 12>; [33.00%] else goto <bb 7>; [67.00%] <bb 12> [local count: 1157728]: <bb 3> [local count: 116930483]: <bb 5> [local count: 116930483]: foo (); goto <bb 3>; [100.00%] and BB5 is control dependent on BB3 (on the edge 3->5), so we mark the block necessary but since there's nothing in it we do not make its control dependences necessary. I think what triggers this latent bug is the "double" forwarder with the call in the latch block rather than in the header when one tries this on extern int foo(); void blah() { int x = foo(); if (x) while (1) foo (); } it's probably latent with a GIMPLE testcase.