https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100758
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Your patch might work. > In fact, I wonder why get_available_features isn't called unconditionally Yes, I would also expect that, but it was not the case even before the big refactoring in g:1890f2f0e210ef515c39728c54151372d36dd187. > for all CPUs that support at least max level >= 1. Or is the worry that > some CPUs might misbehave on CPUID 0x80000000 leaf? Maybe H.J. can answer the question?
