https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103686
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Maybe something like this untested patch: diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c index d9736eaf21c..c7babefa32d 100644 --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c @@ -13615,12 +13615,14 @@ rs6000_gimple_fold_new_builtin (gimple_stmt_iterator *gsi) const char *fn_name2 = (icode != CODE_FOR_nothing) ? get_insn_name ((int) icode) : "nothing"; + unsigned attr = rs6000_builtin_info[fn_code].attr; if (TARGET_DEBUG_BUILTIN) fprintf (stderr, "rs6000_gimple_fold_new_builtin %d %s %s\n", fn_code, fn_name1, fn_name2); - if (!rs6000_fold_gimple) + if ((attr & RS6000_BTC_GIMPLE) == 0 + && !rs6000_fold_gimple) return false; /* Prevent gimple folding for code that does not have a LHS, unless it is Same thing needs to happen to rs6000_gimple_fold_builtin too