https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103686
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- -m[no-]fold-gimple is also a very badly named user option since it suggests that 'fold' and 'gimple' are terms known to programmers. I'm just guessing it was added to avoid "inlining" intrinsics as GIMPLE, so -m[no-]inline-intrinsics would have been more appropriate ;) (or -m[no-]optimize-intrinsics)
