https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103115
Jürgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |juergen.reuter at desy dot de
--- Comment #3 from Jürgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #2)
> I can confirm the bug with gcc 9 (didn't check any other
> version).
>
> Current trunk gives me
>
> .f90:10:13:
>
> 10 | ]
> | 1
> interner Compiler-Fehler: tree check: expected integer_cst, have save_expr
> in gfc_trans_array_constructor_value, at fortran/trans-array.c:2187
> 0x1002ebcf tree_check_failed(tree_node const*, char const*, int, char
> const*, ...)
> ../../trunk/gcc/tree.c:8689
> 0x101d89bf tree_int_cst_elt_check(tree_node*, int, char const*, int, char
> const*)
> ../../trunk/gcc/tree.h:3633
> 0x101d89bf tree_int_cst_elt_check(tree_node*, int, char const*, int, char
> const*)
> ../../trunk/gcc/tree.h:3629
> 0x101d89bf gfc_trans_array_constructor_value
> ../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:2187
> 0x101d9563 trans_array_constructor
> ../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:2900
> 0x101d9563 gfc_add_loop_ss_code
> ../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:3180
> 0x101d9f6f gfc_conv_loop_setup(gfc_loopinfo*, locus*)
> ../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:5430
> 0x102350db gfc_trans_assignment_1
> ../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:11642
> 0x101ba337 trans_code
> ../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans.c:1916
>
> Marking as regression for the ICE at least.
Thomas, are you sure? I cannot see an ICE, neither with the master from
September 21 nor with the master from yesterday.
