https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103115
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code,
| |wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|reallocation of character |[12 Regression]
|array fails when appending |reallocation of character
|a constant size 4 array |array fails when appending
| |a constant size 4 array
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Last reconfirmed| |2021-11-15
CC| |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I can confirm the bug with gcc 9 (didn't check any other
version).
Current trunk gives me
.f90:10:13:
10 | ]
| 1
interner Compiler-Fehler: tree check: expected integer_cst, have save_expr in
gfc_trans_array_constructor_value, at fortran/trans-array.c:2187
0x1002ebcf tree_check_failed(tree_node const*, char const*, int, char const*,
...)
../../trunk/gcc/tree.c:8689
0x101d89bf tree_int_cst_elt_check(tree_node*, int, char const*, int, char
const*)
../../trunk/gcc/tree.h:3633
0x101d89bf tree_int_cst_elt_check(tree_node*, int, char const*, int, char
const*)
../../trunk/gcc/tree.h:3629
0x101d89bf gfc_trans_array_constructor_value
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:2187
0x101d9563 trans_array_constructor
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:2900
0x101d9563 gfc_add_loop_ss_code
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:3180
0x101d9f6f gfc_conv_loop_setup(gfc_loopinfo*, locus*)
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c:5430
0x102350db gfc_trans_assignment_1
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c:11642
0x101ba337 trans_code
../../trunk/gcc/fortran/trans.c:1916
Marking as regression for the ICE at least.
