[Bug c++/102084] Segfault when lambda is missing return type

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102084

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sergio Losilla from comment #4)
> I see, thanks! The second version (constant_ref) which returns the reference
> to the captured does not trigger the sanitizer, so returning a reference to
> that is valid?

In the second case you are returning a reference to the capatured lamdba
struct.