https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96608
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > > Do we ever transverse the hashtable that use symbolic_binding? If so using > > the pointer value should almost never use really. > > Andrew: sorry, I'm having difficulty parsing and understanding your comment. > Could you rephrase it please? Sory I had a spelling mistake. What I mean is if you ever traversing a hashtable, the hash should not use the value of a pointer because it could change between runs.
